![]() is switching to Mac objectively out of the question ?Įspecially since even with the high end M2 Pro Mac mini W/ 32 GB memory and 1 TB storage and a modest 3rd partyĭisplay your looking at $2k to $2. ![]() I have a 16 channel analog mixing desk which I still want to use however my. I understand that Carbon can handle 16 tracks of ADAT inputs along with its own 8 channels of Mic pres. Three things come to mind: 1-it can be dangerous to jump onto anything in its first release (its likely to have lots of issues to iron out) 2-if you are buying an 'off the shelf' PC, that can be a bad option for Pro Tools. Which then brings up the question, given the above. Im currently undergoing a major studio upgrade and Im hoping that it wont be too long before Avid develops a windows version of Carbon. Īnd even if all that were accomplished it would likely up the Cost of Carbon AND you would have to also purchase a new AVB compatible PC as well. So the question Avid would naturally be asking themselves would be:::can we expect sufficient purchases and return from windows users to make it economically feasible enough to consider it. #3 PC manufactures would have to implement AVB #2 Windows would have to recode to accommodate AVB #1 Avid having to either implement both the software/firmware and or (as you asked ) for second connection protocol to TB or USB C and add that and HW connection and software coding to make that work _ and then there is the issue that the current expansion protocol for the additional Carbon Pre/s is AVB ![]() Īgain I could be off here but seems it would take Because Avid could come up with something.I'm by no means a tech geek but seems to me from what I have read it is both a software issue and a hardware issue. This would be in line with the current Intel-based 16-inch MacBook Pro, which is available with up to 64GB of RAM.įor me If I had a PC but was definitely wanting to get a Carbon (unless my system was no longer working) I would simply wait. The next-generation Apple silicon chip will also apparently support up to 64GB of memory, compared to the current maximum of 16GB. That said this statement and no sings (or rumors) of apple working on expanding the ram support for the next version of the cpu." means ,more RAM, then it seems they will be including more RAM The Avid ® Pro Tools Carbon audio interface for music production has been described as a creative game changer its innovative use of eight onboard HDX processors and a custom FPGA enable you to track and monitor with near-zero latency when using AAX DSP plug-ins. To clarify not currently having Windows support is NOT " refusal to do windows support" those are two entirely different concepts. So Avid again, shooting themselves in the foot. The gpu is less a problem for audio guys, but 16 gb of ram limitation and no sings (or rumors) of apple working on expanding the ram support for the next version of the cpu. The m1 chip, can't even go above 16 gb of ram. What blows my mind even more with refusal to do windows support, even if Avid had to come out with their own avb card or actually include thunderbolt support. I wasn't being critical or serious, just mildly humorous. So, you're right, your i9 machine is more powerful than a funny-coloured new iMac with no ports, but if you want to use Carbon now, you need a Mac and you might be waiting for a year or forever to get Windows support. The thread got nasty with someone threatening violence, and as far as I can tell, got deleted. And over a year later, there's still no Windows version. Someone started a thread called something like "where is LUNA for Windows?" and the UA rep started on some "we're doing YOU a favour by releasing LUNA early" etc, and the thread filled up with thousands of posts, all somehow expecting an imminent release. It just reminded me of when UA released LUNA - for Mac only. I was just joking - I mean, you know that Avid won't say when or if they will support Windows, or if they will let you use AVB hubs, or if they will allow additional units to be chained, or if they will include remote pre-amp control, or anything else? I feel that would be a downgrade from my 14 core i9 computer with 32GB of ram.Īlso I wonder what the new more powerfull Macs coming later this year would bring to the table that would beat out my current setup? As I understand the current M1 iMacs are entry level.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |